Reviewing The G Shock Rangeman VS Mudman: Head to Head

So, you’re in the market for a new watch.

Maybe you’re looking for a new style, or your old watch is just worn out. Whatever the reason, you’re reading this article to decide whether the Mudman or Rangeman from G-Shock is a better fit.

In this article, we will compare both watches; is the Rangeman from G-Shock a better watch than the Mudman?

Is It Durable?

Boost watches from G-Shock are incredibly durable. Just picking them up, lets you know that they’ve been built to last. Both are but and shock resistant and can operate comfortably in temperatures as low as 10 degrees Fahrenheit. Their dial windows on both models were constructed using mineral glass, making them entirely scratch resistant.

If you haven’t heard of mineral class before, it has been specifically manufactured to make it seven times harder than any traditional acrylic glass. The type of glass found on most standard watches. When it comes to your durability, they’re nearly impossible to separate, making them suitable for survivalists, rescue workers, police officers, firefighters, and even the military.

The Mudman’s Moon Phase Calendar

One of the key features that you would find on the Mudman is a moon phase calendar. This will be of particular interest to anyone who follows the moon phases, and it’s not something that is featured on the Rangeman watch. Following the cycles of the moon are of particular interest to fishers, mainly as the moon dictates the tides, something that plays a crucial role in the locating of fishy. Having this watch will help prevent you from having to keep track of these moon phases yourself.

The Rangeman’s Sunset and Sunrise Data

The Rangefinder doesn’t have the moon phase calendar featured in the Mudman. It is equipped with a useful auto sunset and sunrise data indicator. Once you watch and receive timekeeping signals, it will remain up to date.

Both the Mudman and Rangeman Offer a World Clock

If you need to keep up-to-date with times around the world, both phones offer this feature. The Rangeman and the Mudman will allow you to keep track of multiple time zones at once. The critical difference is that the Rangeman supports atomic timekeeping, and the Mudman does not, but it will automatically update your time zones.

The Range Men’s Atomic Timekeeping

As we mentioned previously, the Rangeman offers atomic timekeeping, something that’s not featured in the mud man. Just in case you’re not familiar with atomic timekeeping, it merely means that the watch has a built-in receiver but sends out a signal at midnight. A signal has sent timekeeping information, which helps keep your watch up to date and accurate at all times. This is especially useful when dealing with daylight savings time.

Both the Mudman and Rangeman are Solar-powered

I’ll admit that this is one of the key features that impressed me most about both of these watches; they both come fully equipped with a built-in solar panel. When I was a child, I remember how much I wanted one solar power lunch, and to be honest, this hasn’t changed. Both of them feature solar power means you don’t have to worry about replacing the battery.

Both the Mudman and Rangeman Have a Compass

Another flashback to my youth, my father and I used to go orienteering regularly and if we had a Mudman or Rangeman back then, as both contain a digital compass and would have made our lives a little bit easier. Especially as moving at speed and turning a physical compass around isn’t always very convenient. The compass can be activated either with the push of a button. Interesting me the compass design on both is slightly different.

On the Rangeman, the compass is primarily a digital ticker that is always pointing North, but it also shows you the direction you’re facing; this is dependent on holding the phone card out your chest. The Mudman only shows a digital point the indicates North based on the direction you’re facing when both compasses have been rigorously tested. There are natural and accurate to use, making a very popular with military personnel and survivalists.

Comparing the Designs

At first glance, you would be forgiven for thinking that these watches are the same. Both are primarily black with a black wristband and even have identical style displays. Both have slightly red accents that circle the screen, and these are used to highlight the key areas.

Both the Mudman and the Rangeman I’m very similar dimensions. Mugman is 5.2 cm, and it is 19 mm thick. The range man, on the other hand, is slightly thinner at 18.2 million at also has a diameter of 5.4 cm.

The only key difference in design is in the wristband’s width. The Rangmans wristband is 22mm wide of the Mudman’s wristbands is only 19mm wide. So if you’re trying to make a more fashion-conscious decision, to be honest, but watch the great and choosing between the two on looks alone as nearly impossible.

In Conclusion, Should You Choose the Rangeman or the Mudman?

Both watches are nearly identical. I have very similar features choosing between two comes down to a few key differences. The Rangeman is a durable watch in a compact case, and it offers some neat features and sensors and the promise of atomic timekeeping, But its price point is much higher than the Mudman. In all honesty, I don’t have a problem with this watch, other than the price.

When it comes to choosing between two, I would have to select the Mudman because of the price difference; it’s much more affordable. Crucially the lower price of the Mudman doesn’t detract from the fact that it is an extremely durable phone, yes it lacks a few small sensors found on the Rangeman, but in the grander scheme of things that isn’t a big problem.